Platform / Suite / SynergyBoards
Productivity Suite

SynergyBoards
The board the AI works on too.

A project tracker built from scratch — Trello's drag-and-drop feel, Jira's issue model, epics, sprints, and honest burndown charts. And the platform's AI isn't a plugin here: its own work items appear as first-class cards it files, moves, and comments on.

● Live in production boards.synergytech.cloud Single sign-on Built, not forked
What it replaces
Trelloboards, lists, cards, drag-and-drop, labels, checklists Jiraissue types, epics, sprints, points, burndown
The core

Full Trello parity, then the Jira layers

Boards, lists, and cards with fluid drag-and-drop; a complete card back with labels, due dates, checklists, members, and comments; realtime updates so a card filed from anywhere appears on your open board with no reload.

🗂️Issue model

Epics, stories, tasks, bugs, and subtasks with auto-assigned issue keys, priorities, and story points — card faces show type, key, priority, and points at a glance.

🧬Epic hierarchy

Parent-child links with cycle protection, an epic chip on every child card, and a rollup on the epic — done count, points, and a live progress bar.

Realtime collaboration

Every change appears on every open board the moment it happens — members, assignments, and comments update live for the whole team, no refresh needed.

Agile

Sprints with a burndown that doesn't lie

The backlog view splits work into sprint sections and backlog, with drag-and-drop between them. Sprint lifecycle rules keep the numbers honest: one active sprint per board, and completing a sprint returns unfinished cards to the backlog so velocity reflects what actually shipped.

  • Burndown computed from real completion timestamps — every card records exactly when it was finished
  • Ideal line vs. actual line, drawn only up to today; green when ahead, red when behind
  • Shows "no points estimated" honestly instead of faking a curve
  • Chart math verified against live sprint data: committed minus done, tracked against the ideal day by day

Why build instead of fork?

Because this is both the team's daily dev cockpit and a product in the suite. Owning the data model is what makes the AI-native layer possible — an AI can't be a first-class board member in software that never imagined one.

The wedge

An AI that runs its own board

The platform mind is a first-class member. Cards and comments show who made them — human or mind — and the mind's work items reach the board through its own locked, credentialed doorway.

📥Files its work

The mind's proposals and goals become badged cards on its own ops board — re-running a sync updates existing cards instead of duplicating them. 23 live work items filed in the first sync.

🔀Moves and comments

The mind advances cards through the workflow and explains itself in comments — observed live moving its highest-value goal to Doing and saying why.

🐛Code review to cards

Automated code-review findings file as bug issues with priority set from risk — high-risk findings route to an attention column automatically.

Guardrails by design: the mind's doorway into the board can only create, move, and comment on cards. No money, no records, nothing irreversible — its higher-stakes actions sit behind separate human-approved controls elsewhere in the platform.

Build

How it's put together

Next.js + ReactPostgreSQLDrag-and-drop engineLive updatesOne company loginDocker Compose
Keep exploring

Related